Conservative groups, such as the Judicial Crisis Network and the Article III Project, are assailing the secrecy surrounding the ABA process and contend that the organization relied on cherry-picked information from disgruntled employees and political enemies in its “not qualified” evaluation of VanDyke.
“Suspected terrorists in Gitmo have more due process, including the ability to confront their witnesses and see the evidence against them, than conservative judicial nominees have with the ABA,” said Mike Davis of the Article III Project. You can read more here.